Zorac (zorac) wrote,
Zorac
zorac

Playing with numbers...

I was idly playing with numbers in my head the other day, something to occupy my mind while I trudged back from Sainsbury's with a load of shopping. In particular, I was looking at number sequences (you know, what number comes next - 1, 3, 5, 7, ? or 1, 4, 9, 16, ?) and came up with the following (related, but calculated in opposite ways):

1 ... 4 ... 19,683 ... ?
1 ... 4 ... 7,625,597,484,987 ... ?

The answer to the first series is a mere
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456
The second, as you can probably guess, is larger. Much larger. In fact, it's exactly
226,815,615,859,885,194,199,148,049,996,411,692,254,958,731,641,184,786,755,447,122,887,443,528,060,147,093,953,603,748,596,333,806,855,380,063,716,372,972,101,707,507,765,623,893,139,892,867,298,012,168,192
or approximately
5 x 108,072,304,726,028,225,379,282,369,632,412,842,737,810,037,345,818,396,835,407,833,195,922,269,447,488,939,454,873,506,883,657,604,175,736,107,203,603,983,535,115,431,016,379,958,411,831,793,261,615,652,260
Even more approximately, that's
5 x 108 x 10153
Time to play with some big numbers:
5 x 10googol x 8 x 1053
5 x googolplex8,000 x 1050
5 x googolplex8,000 √googol

However I put it, that is one very big number, almost impossible to visualise - Asimov's essay Skewered! details just how hard to visualise big numbers can be. Final challenge, if you want to prove that you actually solved the puzzle: explain how the series was derived.
Tags: geekery
Subscribe

  • Must resist...

    Oh, shiny black MacBook, how do I perve on thee! I'm sorely tempted to go out and get one right now, but I already made the decision to wait for at…

  • OMG! Userpics!

    Did we say 10 extra userpics? We meant 40 extra userpics! I have brought all my old icons back from the graveyard. Plus a GIP!

  • Strangling the witness? I'm going to allow it.

    Further to this post, I have decided that my flat shall be henceforth known as The T00blerone - partially because I like that name best, but mostly…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Comments allowed for friends only

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 19 comments
I'm guessing at - let's see if HTML is good enough to be able to produce this -

1 , 22, 333, 4444

and a similar thing for the second one but instead of there being n recursions of "powers of n", there are n! recursions of "powers of n".

Yay HTML! :-)

Deleted comment

Deleted comment

I can't argue with that. Trying to calculate those numbers in one's head is however difficult. Particularly when they come out differently in different directions - as explained below, both of the series are the same, just with the parentheses in different places. Using smaller numbers (and no more sups)

((2^2)^2)^2 = (4^2)^2 = 16^2 = 256
2^(2^(2^2)) = 2^(2^4) = 2^16 = 65,536

With 4s in place of the 2s, you get the original final answers.
But of course ((4^4)^4)^4 is the same as 4^(4*4*4) so your first series condenses to that of n^(n^(n-1)).
Ooh! That's neat. Should've figured that one myself.

Unfortunately, the second series isn't no neatly condensing (unless there's an operater which is to ^ as Σ is to + and (IIRC) Π is to *). Best I can do is functional:

f(n) = g(n, n);
g(x, 0) = 1;
g(x, y + 1) = x ^ g(x, y)
There's Arrow Notation which I think is what we're after and which uses uses a ^ symbol with a | symbol under it. I cannot think how to make this character on a PC, which is annoying, because it used to be very easy on a Spectrum. (SYMBOL SHIFT and 6, I think...?) (Checks - not particularly close. SYMBOL SHIFT and H.)

There's almost certainly a Unicode glyph for it.

zorac

17 years ago

imc

17 years ago

zorac

17 years ago

Deleted comment

It'smyjournalIcandowhatIwant!

Deleted comment

zorac

17 years ago

Deleted comment

zorac

17 years ago

Deleted comment

zorac

17 years ago

imc

17 years ago

Playing about a bit, I think that the second one is what we both identified for the first (1, 22, 333, 4444) and that the first one is the slightly more sane 11, 221, 3321, 44321.

Go go Google Calculator!
...or maybe not.

Deleted comment

Is it a bird?
Is it a plane?
No! It's <sup>-erman!
And in a mere 6 minutes from my original posting ;-)
Actually, they're poth the series you gave, just calculated in oposite directions, the first being
1, 22, (33)3, ((44)4)4
and the second
1, 22, 3(33), 4(4(44))

  • Must resist...

    Oh, shiny black MacBook, how do I perve on thee! I'm sorely tempted to go out and get one right now, but I already made the decision to wait for at…

  • OMG! Userpics!

    Did we say 10 extra userpics? We meant 40 extra userpics! I have brought all my old icons back from the graveyard. Plus a GIP!

  • Strangling the witness? I'm going to allow it.

    Further to this post, I have decided that my flat shall be henceforth known as The T00blerone - partially because I like that name best, but mostly…